media consumption

...   music, books, pix & other media on the menu

May 01, 2005

The DaVinci Code

0385504209.gif
My dad has been bugging me--no, that's too strong a way of saying it--he's been politely asking me every time I see him if I've read this book yet. Well, now I have.

It's pretty much what I expected: a straightforward murder mystery with plot with a few of twists and turns and red herrings, but in the end, a fairly predicatable resolution to the mystery. But that's not the part that makes the book worth reading. The interesting part is all of the esoteric background information underlying the mystery.

Dan Brown has set his murder in the midst of a vast conspiratorial web involving the Catholic Church and its conservative prelature Opus Dei, the Knights Templar secret society, the art of Leonardo DaVinci, early Christian gnostics, the legend of the Holy Grail, and more. I'm not going to spoil the story by listing the details. You can read spoilers at any number of websites that have sprung up to debunk the conspiracy that Brown has used in his novel.

Normally, I might get worked up about a guy who plays fast and loose with historical facts, but for some reason, here I'm inclined to shrug my shoulders and say it's fiction. I think I feel this way mainly because the theory is so all-encompassingly incredible that most readers should be able to see through the claims, or at least not take them seriously until undertaking further investigation.

That said, there is something fishy about Da Vinci's Last Supper, but I'm not about to try to overthrow the Vatican because of it.

Posted by ksmoker | permalink | TrackBack

Other Entries for "On the Nightstand"

Comments

After I read The Da Vinci Code, I got a copy of Holy Blood, Holy Grail to see what the story was. I was blown away by the lack of evidence for the whole case - or more precisely, how one extremely dubious source of evidence gets magnified into and multiplied into coincidence after coincidence that surely must mean something more, right? It seems it was all mostly based on some anonymously published pamphlets in France that over time described the history of the secret priory (or whatever the word is), and, lo and behold, these pamphlets created a consistent picture! How shocking...

Posted by: Mike at May 5, 2005 05:03 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?