April 06, 2005
Ice Cream Math
Okay. So while I was getting myself some ice cream tonight (Edy's Vanilla Bean) I thought about my dad's peculiar ice-cream-scooping methodology. He likes to scoop ice cream from the half-gallon boxes (usually Perry's or Breyer's) in rectangular shapes, the goal being to leave as little surface area as possible exposed for freezer burn. I've always assumed, but never proved, that this is, in fact, the best way to go about achieving that goal. Tonight, I decided to find out for sure.
First, let's assume that the carton of ice cream measures 8 x 4 x 4 inches, like so:
Now, I figure that there are eight servings in each carton--there are probably more, but knowing how much my dad likes ice cream, let's stick with eight. And let's assume that he eats one serving every night. The first serving would leave 16 square inches of ice cream exposed, thusly:
The next night, the second serving would also leave 16 square inches exposed:
Hmmm, except 8 of those square inches were already exposed the night before, so let's suppose that the effects are cumulative and we can call this 24 total inches exposed.
Okay, now the typical ice cream consumer would just start scooping from the middle leaving a roughly semi-spherical hole of exposed ice cream, (use your imagination):
And here comes the geeky math part. (Matt had better check my work.) We know that each day, dad consumes 16 cubic inches of ice cream (2 x 2 x 4). To find the total exposed area of the semi-spherical indentation, we will use the volume of the ice cream scooped to find the radius of the indentation. Then we can use the radius to determine the surface area.
The formula for the volume of our half-sphere shaped hole:
The formula for the surface area of the hole:
Solving for r in the first equation and plugging it in to the second equation results in:
(okay, I'm busted, this was all really just an excuse to play with LaTeX)
Solving this equation gives a value in the neighborhood of 24.4 square inches, more than Dad's method even considering the cumulative effect. Turns out, the next night, as the hole gets deeper, the exposed surface area is 38.7 square inches. Freezer burn city. Dad's right...I never doubted it.
Best way to avoid freezer burnt ice cream is to press a layer of plastic wrap on the remaining ice cream after eating. Cut an 8in X 4in piece of plastic wrap and for each serving, dig 1/2 inch down into the ice cream, across it's entire suface. Place wrap on top of remainder. 1 piece of plastic and a new scoop method, no burn.
And who'd have believed I didn't use any math.
rich c.
Rich! Nice to hear from you.
That technique sounds like it could get sticky. Still, that's not too great a price to pay for freezer-burn-free ice cream.
Posted by: ken at April 7, 2005 02:53 PMI thought your calculations looked ok. The other math teachers got a kick out of the problem. I will definatly use this in class along with the volume of dad's trailers including finding the number of eggs that fit in his egg trailer.
Dad's method is the best in my book I wouldn't scoop any other way!
matt
By the way great graphics for the pictures and equations!!
Posted by: matt at April 8, 2005 04:34 PMYou boys worry to much. The best way to avoid freezer burn is to eat it all!!! and of course vanilla is the best way with a few potatoe chips!!
Posted by: kay at April 11, 2005 08:27 AMHmm, but, aesthetics aside, wouldn't it be better just to slice off a 4 x 4 x 1 piece of ice cream from the end? Same surface area exposed, but no cumulative effect. And what about the sticky knuckle effect? I think that defies mathematical explanation.
Posted by: Doug at April 11, 2005 09:42 AMDoug brings up a good point. I think that slicing off 4x4x1 slices works well, once you get the first chunk out of the box. The 4x2x2 chunk helps alleviate the sticky knuckle problem at the beginning.
Plus, my dad has this straight-edged ice-cream scooper that really helps with all the right angles involved. Now way can I duplicate his process using my normal scoop-shaped scooper and still avoid the sticky knuckles.
Posted by: ken at April 11, 2005 09:53 AMAnd of course, as usual, Kay has the most practical solution.
Posted by: ken at April 11, 2005 09:55 AMWait, wait, wait! What about hypotenusal construction? Say your Dad needed a 16 in^3 chunk of ice cream. An isosceles wedge that is 4 inches long, 2 inches wide, and 4 inches high would do the trick. That would leave an exposed surface area of only 8 sq. inches, wouldn't it? But the trouble is, I don't know how you'd make the cut.
Posted by: Doug at April 11, 2005 02:59 PMBen-Lag
Capitalism, Chinese-Style
Year of the Sleeping Dog
Learning from Each Other
Home at Last
We Are Family
Ladies Man
Feeling Blessed
Traveling in a Pack
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003


