February 11, 2005
A Joke for Music Geeks
"Mine is a much better silent piece," Batt declared. "I have been able to say in one minute what Cage could only say in four minutes and thirty-three seconds."
(from a Henry Kisor review, link via aworks)
Unfortunately, the story behind the joke isn't so funny.
J: So what do you think of the guy that is being sued by the John Cage estate?
T: Actually the score to John Cage’s piece didn’t make 4’33” explicit, he only said the title is derived from the length of any given performance. So 1’00” was, in a way, already accounted for.
J: You think the guy should pay?
T: Of course, he stole someone else’s idea and made it his own
J: So you’re saying that John Cage has a permanent copyright on all silent music
T: I guess that does kind of put a damper on the possibility of a genre that could have been silent music, doesn't it...
J: I hope you’re not making fun of me
T: No, I was thinking I could specialize in silent music… become the most prolific composer in my field.
I've also heard that if Batt hadn't explicitly referenced Cage in his song's title, then his 1'00" piece could be argued to have been an original work, i.e., not derivitave of Cage's.
I'm thinking about writing a piece for 99 metronomes...
http://www.artnotart.com/fluxus/gligeti-poemesymphonique.html
hey i just thought i would say that we actually studied 4:33 at school and it was hillarious. i find the copyright on his pieces of music absurd. most music (and i dare not say all as thatwould be generalising)is derived from something else. for example,peter sculthorpe takes most of his styles of music from others; whether it be aboriginals, mendelssohn or anyone else he admires in some way....and peter sculthorpe is much liked. so we must not criticise one for taking someone elses style and not another
Posted by: jazmin at March 11, 2005 03:40 AMThanks Jazmin, I think you've got a good point. If Batt had said he was only inspired by Cage, then he would be fine, legally speaking, I think maybe.
But if not, Cage's estate still holds the copyright on silent music, so all you have to do is wait for the copyright to expire when silent music will then become available in the public domain.
Posted by: Ken at March 11, 2005 08:49 AMI think you should reconsider the background music for your site. If the Cage estate ever finds out...
Posted by: Ted at March 11, 2005 08:37 PMYou like that? I call it "Threnody for a Dying Hard Drive." My application with ASCAP is pending.
Posted by: ken at March 12, 2005 09:31 AMBen-Lag
Capitalism, Chinese-Style
Year of the Sleeping Dog
Learning from Each Other
Home at Last
We Are Family
Ladies Man
Feeling Blessed
Traveling in a Pack
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003


